|
|
||
|
Currently Hong Kong has over 80% of the international flights out of the Pearl River Delta. With the 3rd Runway proponents hope to maintain a large share of this growing market. But with only 7% of the population and manufacturing moving ever further land inwards, how sensible is that? The economic gains benefit a few, while the rest of the community pays. It is not just the money: Air pollution, noise, loss of marine habitat, and traffic – lots of it. 現在香港肩負珠角三角洲80%的國際航班，市場不斷擴大，機管局希望藉著擴建來增加利潤。但我們只有７％的人口，而本地工業持續北移，代表著甚麼？我們只有少數人受惠，所有卻為此而負上沉重的代價：空氣污染、噪音、失去海洋生態、交通流量大增……甚至更多
The Environmental Impact Assessment suggests that there is nothing to worry about. That is until you start to peel away the assumptions. Little effort is made by the Airport to provide a world class environmental plan. Deadline for comments on the EIA is this Saturday, 19 July 2014. Please email your comment to [email protected] or fax to 2147-0864. Green Sense campaign against the third runway or check out this Facebook event (Chinese only). 環境評估報告試圖以「假設」掩飾真相，將龍門左搬右置，指工程不會帶來壞影響。國際機場的擴建卻沒有一個國際級的環境保護計劃。環評報告現正接受大眾的意見，截止日期為2014年7月19日。請立即向環保署署長反映你對機場第三跑環境影響評估報告的意見，把意見電郵至 eiaocommen[email protected] 或 傳真至 2147-0894。
Marine: WWF and others have identified that there is no sanctuary for the dolphins during construction. They also point out that the promised Marine Park after completion is too late, in the wrong place, and not more than an empty promise as fishing and marine traffic can continue through the so-called park. They call for a marine reserve (not just a park) to be established at Southwest Lantau instead. Support the WWF campaign or the 30 Third Runway Victims campaign 海洋：世界環境自然基金會及其他團體發現計劃沒有預留水域讓中華白海豚可在工程期間避難。同時，他們又指出在工程完成後才設立海岸公園為時已晚，位置錯誤。而且漁船及其他船隻一樣可以在公園內如常活動，所謂保護的界線形同虛設。他們要求在大嶼西南海域設立ć! 56;具保護性的區域。
Air quality: Friends of the Earth looked at the air quality assessments and found large discrepancies with the Environmental Impact Assessments completed for the same area for the Hong Kong Zhuhai Macau Bridge a few years ago. Their point is that if we want to allow the additional air pollution, where will we cut back on emissions? Support the Friends of the Earth campaign 空氣質素：地球之友發現，機場三跑環評的空氣質素評估部分跟鄰近的港珠澳大橋工程的有明顯差異。這幾年來，該區的空氣質素顯著變差。我們可以接受更差的空氣嗎？我們可以如何阻止排放污染物？
Noise: The forecast noise impacts are ultra conservative – and pretend there is no excessive aircraft noise in Ma Wan, Tsing Yi, Sam Tseng, ... Noise monitoring records from the Civil Aviation Department shows that noise over 70dB is a regular occurrence in these places. And you can expect the situation to worsen for Ma Wan, Sam Tseng and Tuen Mun. And there are no fines for airlines who cause these excessive noise events. There should be. Designing Hong Kong noise report 噪音：預計的噪音影響非常保守，報告指馬灣、青衣及深井等地不會受額外航班的影響。但根據民航處的數據，以上地方早已分70分貝以上的噪音滋擾，未來情況只會惡化。我們建議應引入罰款機制針對過度的噪音問題。 創建香港有關第三跑噪音的報告（只有英文版）
|
||
| www.designinghongkong.com | Facebook |Contact | ||
If you're not interested any more » unsubscribe
